VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH JX1075C

CaseIH JX1075C

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH JX1075C
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH JX1075C VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Jesi, Italy 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
19.5 gal (50.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Independent Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 4.3% Farm Tractors have independent hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Iveco  vs 4.4% Farm Tractors have Iveco
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x4.528 Inches [104 X 115 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
178.8 ci (127.3 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 18.0:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2300  (2298 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
75 hp (54.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase 83.8 Inches [212 Cm] (2wd)81.3 Inches [206 Cm] (4wd) 
Weight (ballasted)
7685 lbs (7662 lbs higher than average)
vs
23,578 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Hydraulics Valves
(1.36 higher than average)
vs
2.64

Valve flow
16.9 gpm (0.18 gpm lower than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
II  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 23.3% Farm Tractors have II
Rear lift
3960 lbs (3949 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
62 hp (50.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
64.5 hp (112.75 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
55.3 hp (108.65 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
75 hp (72.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp



Scroll To Top

saved