VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall DX60

CaseIH Farmall DX60

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
CaseIH Farmall DX60
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall DX60 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Shibaura  vs 0.8% Farm Tractors have Shibaura
Distributor Caseih 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
13.5 gal (56.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Mid RPMs
74.8  (72.8 higher than average)
vs
2,034

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  vs 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Brakes Differential Wet Disc  vs 2.2% Farm Tractors have differential wet disc
Cab Two-post Rops. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Shibaura  vs 2.5% Farm Tractors have Shibaura
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.307x3.937 Inches [84 X 100 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
135.2 ci (170.9 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 22.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2800  (2798 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
60 hp (69.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Transmission Power Shuttle 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width
64.4 inches (7.78 inches lower than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Length
137.3 inches (24.66 inches lower than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height (ROPS)
95 inches (0.86 inches higher than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Total flow
17.53 gpm (7.12 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Gears
12 forward (8.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Power
PTO (claimed) 50 Hp [37.3 Kw] (power Shuttle)51 Hp [38.0 Kw] (synchro) 
PTO (tested)
51.57 hp (125.68 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Engine (gross)
60 hp (35.15 hp lower than average)
vs
95.15 hp



Scroll To Top

saved