VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall DX55

CaseIH Farmall DX55

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Farmall DX55
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall DX55 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
13.5 gal (56.85 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd4x4 Mfwd 4wd Optional  vs 21.2% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD optional
Brakes Independent Mechanical Wet Disc  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have independent mechanical wet disc
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Shibaura  vs 2.5% Farm Tractors have Shibaura
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 3.307x3.937 Inches [84 X 100 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
135.3 ci (170.8 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 22.4:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2700  (2698 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
55 hp (74.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type Synchronized Shuttle  vs 10.4% Farm Tractors have synchronized shuttle
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
74.8 inches (19.53 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
4860 lbs (4842 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Hydraulics
Total flow
17.12 gpm (7.53 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Power Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Gears
12 forward (8.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds   
Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih Lx188 
Loader Height (to pin)
112 inches (4.7 inches lower than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2500 lbs (2498 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at 500mm)
1830 lbs (549.91 lbs higher than average)
vs
1280.09 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at pin)
5000 lbs (4997 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,719 lbs

Loader Breakout force (at 500mm)
3114 lbs (3112 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,362 lbs

Backhoe
Backhoe Backhoe type Caseih Bhx190 
Backhoe Digging depth
90 inches (4.06 inches lower than average)
vs
94.06 inches

Backhoe Bucket force
2712 lbs (2709 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,376 lbs

Backhoe Dipperstick force
1950 lbs (1948 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,098 lbs

Backhoe-2
Backhoe-2 Backhoe type Caseih Bhx1102 
Backhoe-2 Digging depth
102 inches (0.67 inches higher than average)
vs
101.33 inches

Backhoe-2 Bucket force
3550 lbs (3547 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,803 lbs

Backhoe-2 Dipperstick force
2225 lbs (2223 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,276 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3465 lbs (3459 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed) 47 Hp [35.0 Kw] (synchro)46 Hp [34.3 Kw] (power Shuttle) 
PTO (tested)
48.01 hp (129.24 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Engine
55 hp (92.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp



Scroll To Top

saved