VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Farmall 65C

CaseIH Farmall 65C

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Farmall 65C
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Farmall 65C VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Jesi, Italy 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
19.8 gal (50.55 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Straddle Deck Platform With Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Fiat Powertrain Technologies (fpt)  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(0.46 lower than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
195 ci (111.1 ci lower than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2300  (2298 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Air cleaner Dual Dry Elements 
Engine Power
64 hp (65.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Starter type Electric 
Engine Emissions Tier Iii 
Transmission
Transmission Type Mechanical Shuttle  vs 5% Farm Tractors have mechanical shuttle
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
85.6 inches (8.73 inches lower than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Height (cab)
91.4 inches (18.14 inches lower than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Height (ROPS)
77.8 inches (16.34 inches lower than average)
vs
94.14 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Open Center 
Pump flow
12.8 gpm (6.66 gpm lower than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

Total flow
20.2 gpm (4.45 gpm lower than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Rear valves
1 to (1.55 to lower than average)
vs
2.55 to

Steering flow
7.4 gpm (0.56 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Power Shuttle 
Transmission-2 Gears
16 forward (4.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Loader
Loader Loader type Caseih L720 
Loader Height (to pin)
122 inches (5.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
85 inches (5.98 inches lower than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
30 inches (0.12 inches higher than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
65  (15.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
45  (10.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
2100 lbs (2098 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader Breakout force (lift)
2650 lbs (2647 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,764 lbs

Loader-2
Loader-2 Loader type Caseih L730 
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
133 inches (3.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
96 inches (4.51 inches lower than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
25 inches (12.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
55  (1.99 lower than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
50  (214.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
2500 lbs (2497 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

Loader-2 Breakout force (lift)
3100 lbs (3097 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,581 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type I/II  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
3960 lbs (3954 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
50 hp (62.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
59 hp (118.25 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
50.9 hp (113.05 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
64 hp (83.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
730  (108.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved