VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Buhler Versatile 305

Buhler Versatile 305

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Buhler Versatile 305 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2008  
Production Manufacturer Buhler Versatile  vs 1.1% Farm Tractors have Buhler Versatile
Factory Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
250 gal (179.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
20 gal (0.58 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Optional  vs 1.3% Farm Tractors have optional
Mechanical
Brakes Single Dry Caliper Standard  vs 0.1% Farm Tractors have single dry caliper standard
Cab Cab Standard With Heat And A/c 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Cummins Qsm11  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have Cummins QSM11
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.92x5.79 Inches [125 X 147 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
661 ci (354.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Torque
1050 lb (589.9 lb higher than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1400  (50.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Power
305 hp (175.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Oil capacity
38.8 qts (21.87 qts higher than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Coolant
58 qts (34.21 qts higher than average)
vs
23.79 qts

Transmission
Transmission Comments Four Synchronized Gears In Each Of Three Ranges 
Transmission Transmission Partial Synchro 
Transmission Gears
12 forward (3.13 forward lower than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
142 inches (47.67 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
275 inches (113.04 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
143 inches (36.03 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

4WD turn radius
16 feet (1.97 feet lower than average)
vs
17.97 feet

Weight (max capacity)
34000 lbs (33951 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Load Sensing 
Hydraulics Valves
4 to (1.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Capacity (cu. ft.)
20 gal (0.58 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Total flow
50 gpm (25.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Transmission Powershift 
Transmission-2 Gears
12 forward (8.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 3/4n Optional 
Rear lift
13000 lbs (12989 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
Engine
305 hp (157.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
160  (48.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(1.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
950  (111.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved