Home > Farm Tractors > AGCO RT150

AGCO RT150

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

AGCO RT150

Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare

AGCO RT150

VS

All other Farm Tractors

Production
Model Year		2004
Production Manufacturer		AGCO (equals average)	vs	5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO	Compare similar Production Manufacturer (AGCO)
Factory		Beauvais, France

Capacity
Capacity Fuel		100 gal (29.65 gal higher than average)	vs	70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs		540 (68.25 lower than average)	vs	608.25
Rear PTO		Independent	vs	78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Front PTO		Optional	vs	86.9% Farm Tractors have optional

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering		Hydrostatic Power	vs	81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis		4x2 2wd	vs	12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes		Hydraulic Wet Disc	vs	24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab		Cab Standard With Optional Automatic Climate Control.
Differential lock		Electro-hydraulic Front And Rear

Engine
Engine Fuel		Diesel	vs	87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type		Cummins	vs	2.2% Farm Tractors have Cummins
Engine Aspiration		Turbocharged	vs	36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders		6 (1.54 higher than average)	vs	4.46
Engine Bore/Stroke		4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm]
Engine Displacement		408 ci (101.9 ci higher than average)	vs	306.10 ci	Compare similar Engine Displacement (408) ci
Engine Cooling		Liquid	vs	86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression		17.5:1
Engine Rated RPMs		2200 (2198 higher than average)	vs	2,340	Compare similar Engine Rated RPMs (2,200)
Engine Torque		551 lb (90.9 lb higher than average)	vs	460.10 lb
Engine Torque RPMs		1200 (250.81 lower than average)	vs	1450.81
Engine Starter volts		12 (0.58 lower than average)	vs	12.58
Engine Air cleaner		Dual Paper Elements
Pre-heating		Grid Heater

Transmission
Transmission Type		Continuously Variable Transmission	vs	3.3% Farm Tractors have continuously variable transmission
Transmission Transmission		Powermaxx Cvt
Transmission Gears		Infinite (2-range) Forward And Reverse
Transmission Speeds

Dimensions
Wheelbase		113.8 inches (19.47 inches higher than average)	vs	94.33 inches
Weight (operating)		16, 415 Lbs [7445 Kg] (4wd Cvt Cab)
Front tread		61.2 To 89.2 Inches [155 To 226 Cm]
Rear tread		60.5 To 120 Inches [153 To 304 Cm]
Clearance (drawbar)		14 inches (2.88 inches lower than average)	vs	16.88 inches
Weight (ballasted)		19880 lbs (19857 lbs higher than average)	vs	23,578 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type		Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc)
Hydraulics Valves		4 or (1.36 or higher than average)	vs	2.64 or
Pressure		2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)	vs	2,737 psi
SCV flow		29 gpm (0.27 gpm lower than average)	vs	29.27 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type		Partial Power Shift
Transmission-2 Comments		Four Power Shift Gears In Four Ranges.
Transmission-2 Transmission		Quadrashift
Transmission-2 Gears		32 forward (11.85 forward higher than average)	vs	20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type		II/IIIN
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)		14500 lbs (14494 lbs higher than average)	vs	6,099 lbs
Control		Electronic Lower-link

Power
PTO (claimed)		150 hp (37.32 hp higher than average)	vs	112.68 hp
PTO (tested)		156.18 hp (21.07 hp lower than average)	vs	177.25 hp
Drawbar (tested)		121.9 hp (42.05 hp lower than average)	vs	163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground		Negative
Charging system		Alternator
Charging amps		120 (8.88 higher than average)	vs	111.12

Battery
Volts		12 (equals average)	vs	12.00
Number		2 (0.35 higher than average)	vs	1.65

Related Comparisons

CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum

CaseIH Puma 180

Popular Items

AGCO RT135 Compare

AGCO DT180A Compare

AGCO DT200A Compare

AGCO DT240A Compare

CaseIH MXM140 Maxxum Compare

Related Questions

how big is the engine in AGCO RT150 farm tractor? What is the fuel capacity of AGCO RT150?