Back

Challenger MT265

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Challenger MT265
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT265 VS
Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2003  
Production Manufacturer Iseki  2.3% Farm Tractors have Iseki
Factory Matsuyama, Japan 
Distributor AGCO  
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear PTO Independent  78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mid PTO Optional  53.5% Farm Tractors have optional
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Mfwd 4wd  52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD
Cab Two-post Rops 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Aspiration Natural  25.8% Farm Tractors have Natural
Engine Cylinders
4.46
Engine Cooling Liquid  86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Power
33 hp
129.14 hp
Transmission
Transmission Transmission Powershuttle 
Transmission Gears
16 forward
15.13 forward
Hydraulics
Total flow
12.2 
24.65
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Hydrostatic 
Transmission-2 Gears Infinite (3-range) Forward And Reverse 
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
26.5% Farm Tractors have I
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) 2, 100 Lbs [952 Kg] (gear)1, 940 Lbs [879 Kg] (hydro)  0.4% Farm Tractors have 2 100 lbs [952 kg] (gear)1 940 lbs [879 kg] (hydro)
Rear lift (at ends) 2, 755 Lbs [1249 Kg] (gear)2, 866 Lbs [1300 Kg] (hydro) 
Power
PTO (claimed) 27 Hp [20.1 Kw] (gear)25 Hp [18.6 Kw] (hydro) 
Engine (gross)
33 hp
95.15 hp

saved