Challenger MT225
Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare
Challenger MT225 |
VS |
Farm Tractors |
|
|
Production |
Model Year |
|
2003 |
|
Production Manufacturer |
|
Iseki |
2.3% Farm Tractors have Iseki
|
Factory |
|
Matsuyama, Japan |
|
Distributor |
|
AGCO |
|
|
|
|
Power Take-off (PTO) |
Rear PTO |
|
Independent |
78.6% Farm Tractors have independent |
Mid PTO |
|
Independent |
18.2% Farm Tractors have independent |
|
|
Mechanical |
Mechanical Steering |
|
Hydrostatic Power |
81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power |
Chassis |
|
4x4 Mfwd 4wd |
52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD |
Cab |
|
Two-post Rops |
|
|
|
Engine |
Engine Fuel |
|
Diesel |
87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel |
Engine Cylinders |
|
|
|
Engine Cooling |
|
Liquid |
86% Farm Tractors have Liquid |
Engine Power |
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission |
Transmission Transmission |
|
Hydrostatic |
|
Transmission Gears |
|
Infinite (2-range) Forward And Reverse |
|
|
|
Hydraulics |
Total flow |
|
|
|
|
|
3-Point Hitch |
Rear Type |
|
|
26.5% Farm Tractors have I |
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) |
|
|
|
Rear lift (at ends) |
|
|
|
|
|
Power |
PTO (claimed) |
|
|
|
Engine (gross) |
|
|
|