VS

Home > Farm Tractors > New Holland T9030

New Holland T9030

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
New Holland T9030
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
New Holland T9030 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer New Holland  vs 13.1% Farm Tractors have New Holland
Factory Fargo, North Dakota, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
300 gal (229.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x4 Articulated 4wd  vs 5.5% Farm Tractors have 4x4 articulated 4WD
Brakes Integral Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 1% Farm Tractors have integral hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Heat And Air-conditioning 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Iveco  vs 4.4% Farm Tractors have Iveco
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 5.314x5.906 Inches [135 X 150 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
786 ci (479.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Torque
1430 lb (969.9 lb higher than average)
vs
460.10 lb

Engine Torque RPMs
1400  (50.81 lower than average)
vs
1450.81

Engine Starter volts
24  (11.42 higher than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
385 hp (255.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Oil capacity
32.75 qts (15.82 qts higher than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Starter Electric 
Engine Coolant
84.4 qts (60.61 qts higher than average)
vs
23.79 qts

Maximum Power
423 hp (42.33 hp higher than average)
vs
380.67 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Wheelbase
154 inches (59.67 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
41605 lbs (41587 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Length
298 inches (136.04 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
150 inches (43.03 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Weight (max capacity)
45600 lbs (45551 lbs higher than average)
vs
49,610 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Load Sensing (ccls) 
Hydraulics Valves
4 to (1.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2000 psi (1998 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Valve flow
33 gpm (15.92 gpm higher than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
40  (15.35 higher than average)
vs
24.65

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Full Synchro Shift 
Transmission-2 Gears
24 forward (3.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type Ivn (optional) 
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
19620 lbs (19614 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
339 hp (226.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
390.87 hp (213.62 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
319.41 hp (155.46 hp higher than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
385 hp (237.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
175  (63.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front 710/70R42  
Ag rear 710/70R42  
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Amp-hours
1000  (806.56 higher than average)
vs
193.44



Scroll To Top

saved