VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Challenger MT745B

Challenger MT745B

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
Challenger MT745B VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2005  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Jackson, Minnesota, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
118 gal (47.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Mechanical
Chassis Crawler  vs 3.9% Farm Tractors have crawler
Cab Cab With A/c Standard 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Caterpillar  vs 0.4% Farm Tractors have Caterpillar
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
537 ci (230.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
269 hp (139.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Transmission Cat Powershift 
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Transmission Speeds   
Dimensions
Dimensions Width
133 inches (60.82 inches higher than average)
vs
72.18 inches

Wheelbase
96 inches (1.67 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Length
233 inches (71.04 inches higher than average)
vs
161.96 inches

Height
135.5 inches (28.53 inches higher than average)
vs
106.97 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed-center, Pfc 
Hydraulics Valves
4 to (1.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Pump flow
43.5 gpm (24.04 gpm higher than average)
vs
19.46 gpm

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type 3/3N  
Rear lift
16000 lbs (15989 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
225 hp (112.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
269 hp (121.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
185  (73.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Ag front Tracks 
Ag rear Tracks 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1000  (161.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved