| Challenger MT635B | VS | All other Farm Tractors |
| Production | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Year | 2005 | ||||
| Production Manufacturer |
AGCO (equals average)
|
vs | 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO |
||
| Factory | Beauvais, France | ||||
| Capacity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity Fuel |
159 gal (88.65 gal higher than average)
|
vs |
70.35 gal
|
||
| Hydraulic system |
26.4 gal (6.98 gal higher than average)
|
vs |
19.42 gal
|
||
| Power Take-off (PTO) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear RPMs |
540 (68.25 lower than average)
|
vs |
608.25
|
||
| Rear PTO | Independent | vs | 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent |
||
| Mechanical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Steering | Hydrostatic Power | vs | 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power |
||
| Chassis | 4x4 Mfwd 4wd | vs | 52.8% Farm Tractors have 4x4 MFWD 4WD |
||
| Brakes | Hydraulic Wet Disc | vs | 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc |
||
| Cab | Cab Standard With Heat And A/c. Optional Pneumatic Cab Suspension And Automatic Climate Control. | ||||
| Differential lock | Electrohydraulic Front And Rear | ||||
| Trailer brakes | Hydraulic Optional | ||||
| Transmission | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (cvt) | vs | 1.5% Farm Tractors have continuously variable transmission (CVT) |
||
| Transmission Oil capacity |
70.8 qts (12.02 qts higher than average)
|
vs |
58.78 qts
|
||
| Transmission Transmission | Techstar | ||||
| Transmission Gears | Infinite (2-range) Forward And Reverse | ||||
| Transmission Speeds | |||||
| Dimensions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions Width |
118 inches (45.82 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
72.18 inches
|
||
| Wheelbase |
121.1 inches (26.77 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
94.33 inches
|
||
| Weight (operating) |
19595 lbs (19577 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
18,724 lbs
|
||
| Length |
206 inches (44.04 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
161.96 inches
|
||
| Height (cab) |
123.6 inches (14.06 inches higher than average)
|
vs |
109.54 inches
|
||
| Rear tread | 60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm] | ||||
| Hydraulics | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydraulics Type | Pressure Flow Compensated (pfc) | ||||
| Hydraulics Valves |
4 to (1.36 to higher than average)
|
vs |
2.64 to
|
||
| Pressure |
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
|
vs |
2,737 psi
|
||
| Capacity (cu. ft.) |
26.4 gal (6.98 gal higher than average)
|
vs |
19.42 gal
|
||
| Total flow |
39 gpm (14.35 gpm higher than average)
|
vs |
24.65 gpm
|
||
| 3-Point Hitch | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Type |
III (36.36 lower than average)
|
vs | 4.7% Farm Tractors have III |
||
| Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) |
15600 lbs (15594 lbs higher than average)
|
vs |
6,099 lbs
|
||
| Front Hitch | Ii (optional) | ||||
| Front lift | 7, 700 Lbs [3492 Kg] 12, 100 Lbs [5488 Kg] (optional) | ||||
| Power | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTO (claimed) |
180 hp (67.32 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
112.68 hp
|
||
| PTO (tested) |
199 hp (21.75 hp higher than average)
|
vs |
177.25 hp
|
||
| Drawbar (tested) |
157.87 hp (6.08 hp lower than average)
|
vs |
163.95 hp
|
||
| Electrical | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground | Negative | ||||
| Charging system | Alternator | ||||
| Charging amps |
150 (38.88 higher than average)
|
vs |
111.12
|
||
| Tires | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag front | 380/85R34 | ||||
| Ag rear | 480/80R46 | ||||
| Battery | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volts |
12 (equals average)
|
vs |
12.00
|
||
| Number |
2 (0.35 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.65
|
||
| Cold-cranking amps |
775 (63.52 lower than average)
|
vs |
838.52
|
||
Related Comparisons
Challenger MT635B
Challenger MT665B
Challenger MT655C
CaseIH Steiger 435
John Deere 8320RT
Massey Ferguson 6495