VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Steiger 350

CaseIH Steiger 350

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Steiger 350
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Steiger 350 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2011  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Fargo, North Dakota, Usa 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
220 gal (149.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Exhaust fluid (DEF)
46 gal (18.01 gal higher than average)
vs
27.99 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
1000  (391.75 higher than average)
vs
608.25

Mechanical
Chassis 4x4 Articulated 4wd  vs 5.5% Farm Tractors have 4x4 articulated 4WD
Cab Surveyor Cab Standard. 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Aftercooled  vs 8% Farm Tractors have turbocharged aftercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
531 ci (224.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2000  (1998 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
350 hp (220.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Interim Tier 4 
Maximum Power
385 hp (4.33 hp higher than average)
vs
380.67 hp

Transmission
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears
16 forward (0.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
148 inches (53.67 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (ballasted)
42000 lbs (41977 lbs higher than average)
vs
23,578 lbs

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Pressure Flow Compensating (pfc) 
Valve flow
35 gpm (17.92 gpm higher than average)
vs
17.08 gpm

Total flow
40  (15.35 higher than average)
vs
24.65

Rear valves
4 to (1.45 to higher than average)
vs
2.55 to

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
4N  (32.36 lower than average)
vs 2% Farm Tractors have 4N
Rear lift
20000 lbs (19989 lbs higher than average)
vs
11,787 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
290 hp (177.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

Engine
350 hp (202.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
200  (88.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1000  (161.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved