VS

Home > Farm Tractors > CaseIH Puma 195

CaseIH Puma 195

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
CaseIH Puma 195
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
CaseIH Puma 195 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer Caseih  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have CaseIH
Factory Basildon, England 
Original price (USD) $136, 985 (2010)  
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
116 gal (45.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Hydraulic system
26.5 gal (7.08 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Front PTO Optional  vs 86.9% Farm Tractors have optional
Front RPMs
1000  (24.69 lower than average)
vs
1024.69

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 7.8% Farm Tractors have differential hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard. 
Trailer brakes Hydraulic Optional 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type
CNH  (1696.72 lower than average)
vs 4.6% Farm Tractors have CNH
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
411 ci (104.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 16.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements With Aspirator 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
195 hp (65.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Oil capacity
16 qts (0.93 qts lower than average)
vs
16.93 qts

Engine Emissions Tier 3 
Transmission
Transmission Type Full Power Shift  vs 15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Comments The 17-speed Powershift Transmission Was Standard On 2wd Models. 
Transmission Gears
17 forward (1.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
Wheelbase
113.6 inches (19.27 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating)
17635 lbs (17617 lbs higher than average)
vs
18,724 lbs

Height (cab)
119.7 inches (10.16 inches higher than average)
vs
109.54 inches

Height (exhaust)
122.6 inches (2.93 inches higher than average)
vs
119.67 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Pressure Flow Compensating (pfc) 
Hydraulics Valves
3 to (0.36 to higher than average)
vs
2.64 to

Capacity (cu. ft.)
26.5 gal (7.08 gal higher than average)
vs
19.42 gal

Valve flow 31.7 Gpm [120.0 Lpm] (powershift Std.) 
Total flow
48.7  (24.05 higher than average)
vs
24.65

Steering flow
17 gpm (10.16 gpm higher than average)
vs
6.84 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch Electro-hydraulic Wet Disc 
Transmission-2 Type Full Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments On 4wd Models The 18-speed Transmission Was Standard Equipment. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Econogear 
Transmission-2 Gears
18 forward (2.15 forward lower than average)
vs
20.15 forward

Transmission-2 Speeds   
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type II/IIIN  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
10900 lbs (10894 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Front Hitch Optional 
Rear lift (at ends)
12787 lbs (12781 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,180 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
165 hp (52.32 hp higher than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
189.4 hp (12.15 hp higher than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Engine
195 hp (47.18 hp higher than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
150  (38.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 16.9r30. Rear: 20.8r42 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.65 lower than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
1300  (461.48 higher than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved