Home > Farm Tractors > AGCO RT130

AGCO RT130

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related

AGCO RT130

Compare with other Farm Tractors
Compare

AGCO RT130

VS

All other Farm Tractors

Production
Model Year		2002
Production Manufacturer		AGCO (equals average)	vs	5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO	Compare similar Production Manufacturer (AGCO)
Factory		Beauvais, France

Capacity
Capacity Fuel		108 gal (37.65 gal higher than average)	vs	70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs		540 (68.25 lower than average)	vs	608.25
Rear PTO		Independent	vs	78.6% Farm Tractors have independent

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering		Hydrostatic Power	vs	81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis		4x2 2wd	vs	12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes		Hydraulic Wet Disc	vs	24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab		Cab Standard.

Engine
Engine Fuel		Diesel	vs	87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type		Cummins B5.9t	vs	0.3% Farm Tractors have Cummins B5.9T
Engine Aspiration		Turbocharged	vs	36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders		6 (1.54 higher than average)	vs	4.46
Engine Bore/Stroke		4.016x4.724 Inches [102 X 120 Mm]
Engine Displacement		359 ci (52.9 ci higher than average)	vs	306.10 ci	Compare similar Engine Displacement (359) ci
Engine Cooling		Liquid	vs	86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression		16.3:1
Engine Rated RPMs		2200 (2198 higher than average)	vs	2,340	Compare similar Engine Rated RPMs (2,200)
Engine Torque		434.6 lb (25.5 lb lower than average)	vs	460.10 lb
Engine Torque RPMs		1498 (47.19 higher than average)	vs	1450.81
Engine Starter volts		12 (0.58 lower than average)	vs	12.58
Engine Air cleaner		Two Paper Elements

Transmission
Transmission Clutch		Wet Disc
Transmission Type		Full Power Shift	vs	15.4% Farm Tractors have full power shift
Transmission Gears		18 forward (2.87 forward higher than average)	vs	15.13 forward

Dimensions
Dimensions Width		117.7 inches (45.52 inches higher than average)	vs	72.18 inches
Wheelbase		111.2 inches (16.87 inches higher than average)	vs	94.33 inches
Weight (operating)		16030 lbs (16012 lbs higher than average)	vs	18,724 lbs
Length		198 inches (36.04 inches higher than average)	vs	161.96 inches
Height (cab)		120 inches (10.46 inches higher than average)	vs	109.54 inches
2WD Weight (shipping)		14880 lbs (14874 lbs higher than average)	vs	6,392 lbs
4WD Weight (shipping)		16894 lbs (16886 lbs higher than average)	vs	8,748 lbs
Front tread		64.2 To 81.1 Inches [163 To 205 Cm]
Rear tread		61 To 120 Inches [154 To 304 Cm]

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type		Closed Center
Pressure		2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)	vs	2,737 psi
Pump flow		29 gpm (9.54 gpm higher than average)	vs	19.46 gpm
SCV flow		27.7 gpm (1.57 gpm lower than average)	vs	29.27 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch		Wet Disc
Transmission-2 Type		Partial Power Shift
Transmission-2 Comments		Four Power Shift Gears In Eight Synchronized Ranges.
Transmission-2 Transmission		Quadrashift
Transmission-2 Gears		32 forward (11.85 forward higher than average)	vs	20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type		3/3N
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)		14500 lbs (14494 lbs higher than average)	vs	6,099 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)		130 hp (17.32 hp higher than average)	vs	112.68 hp
PTO (tested)		151.8 hp (25.45 hp lower than average)	vs	177.25 hp
Drawbar (tested)		109 hp (54.95 hp lower than average)	vs	163.95 hp

Electrical
Ground		Negative

Battery
Volts		12 (equals average)	vs	12.00

Related Comparisons

CaseIH Puma 165

Popular Items

AGCO RT145 Compare

AGCO RT135 Compare

AGCO DT180A Compare

AGCO DT220A Compare

AGCO DT240A Compare

Related Questions

What is the fuel capacity of AGCO RT130? how big is the engine in AGCO RT130 farm tractor?