VS

Home > Farm Tractors > AGCO RT110A

AGCO RT110A

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
AGCO RT110A
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
AGCO RT110A VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2007  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Beauvais, France 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
100 gal (29.65 gal higher than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Front PTO Optional  vs 86.9% Farm Tractors have optional
Front RPMs
1000  (24.69 lower than average)
vs
1024.69

Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard. Optional Airmaxx Pneumatic Cab Suspension And Automatic Climate Control. 
Differential lock Front And Rear 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel Electronic Common Rail Fuel Injection  vs 0.5% Farm Tractors have diesel electronic common rail fuel injection
Engine Type Sisudiesel 66cta  vs 0.3% Farm Tractors have SisuDiesel 66CTA
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Intercooled  vs 18.6% Farm Tractors have turbocharged intercooled
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Displacement
402.5 ci (96.4 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dry Cartridge 
Engine Valves
24  (2.87 higher than average)
vs
21.13

Engine Power
135 hp (5.86 hp higher than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Engine Emissions Tier Iii 
Pre-heating Grid Heater 
Maximum Power
160 hp (220.67 hp lower than average)
vs
380.67 hp

Transmission
Transmission Clutch Wet Disc 
Transmission Type Partial Power Shift  vs 11.8% Farm Tractors have partial power shift
Transmission Comments Six Power Shift Gears In Four Synchromesh Ranges. Autodrive Provides Automatic Shifting To Match Load. 
Transmission Transmission Auto-6 
Transmission Gears
24 forward (8.87 forward higher than average)
vs
15.13 forward

Dimensions
4WD Weight (shipping)
12200 lbs (12192 lbs higher than average)
vs
8,748 lbs

Rear tread 61.6 To 80.5 Inches [156 To 204 Cm] 
CVT Weight (shipping)
15100 lbs (15085 lbs higher than average)
vs
15,100 lbs

2WD Wheelbase
115.3 inches (19.22 inches higher than average)
vs
96.08 inches

4WD Wheelbase
113.7 inches (17.67 inches higher than average)
vs
96.03 inches

2WD Length
182.9 inches (27.36 inches higher than average)
vs
155.54 inches

4WD Length
171 inches (10.66 inches higher than average)
vs
160.34 inches

2WD Width 60.7 inches 
4WD Width
78.4 inches (0.12 inches higher than average)
vs
78.28 inches

2WD Height (cab) 142.3 inches 
4WD Height (cab) 114.4 inches 
2WD[162 to 202 cm] 2WD} 64.1 to 79.9 inches {4WD}[162 to 202 cm] {4WD} Front tread 64.1 to 
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) 
Hydraulics Valves
2 to (0.64 to lower than average)
vs
2.64 to

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

Total flow
29 gpm (4.35 gpm higher than average)
vs
24.65 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Continuously Variable Transmission 
Transmission-2 Comments Combination Hydrostatic-mechanical Cvt Transmission. With The Suspended Front Axle A Transport Speed Of 50 Kph Is Available. Creeper Speed Available Down To 0.03 Kph. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Powermaxx Cvt 
Transmission-2 Gears Infinite (two-range) Forward And Reverse 
Transmission-2 Speeds   
Loader
Loader Weight
1586 lbs (416.69 lbs higher than average)
vs
1169.31 lbs

Loader Loader type AGCO FL65  
Loader Height (to pin)
167 inches (50.3 inches higher than average)
vs
116.70 inches

Loader Dump clearance
126 inches (35.02 inches higher than average)
vs
90.98 inches

Loader Dump reach
26 inches (3.88 inches lower than average)
vs
29.88 inches

Loader Dump angle
53  (3.94 higher than average)
vs
49.06

Loader Rollback angle
44  (9.92 higher than average)
vs
34.08

Loader Breakout force (bucket)
10010 lbs (10006 lbs higher than average)
vs
4,271 lbs

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)
5060 lbs (5058 lbs higher than average)
vs
2,412 lbs

Loader-2
Loader-2 Weight
1382 lbs (192.43 lbs lower than average)
vs
1574.43 lbs

Loader-2 Loader type AGCO FL60  
Loader-2 Height (to pin)
167 inches (37.1 inches higher than average)
vs
129.90 inches

Loader-2 Dump clearance
126 inches (25.49 inches higher than average)
vs
100.51 inches

Loader-2 Dump reach
26 inches (11.92 inches lower than average)
vs
37.92 inches

Loader-2 Dump angle
52  (4.99 lower than average)
vs
56.99

Loader-2 Rollback angle
44  (220.73 lower than average)
vs
264.73

Loader-2 Breakout force (bucket)
5720 lbs (5715 lbs higher than average)
vs
5,451 lbs

Loader-2 Lift to full height (at pin)
5720 lbs (5717 lbs higher than average)
vs
3,151 lbs

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type
II  (36.36 lower than average)
vs 23.3% Farm Tractors have II
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
9391 lbs (9385 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Electronic Position And Draft Control 
CVT Rear lift (at 24"/610mm) 10,500 lbs 
Front Hitch Optional 
Front lift
8800 lbs (8793 lbs higher than average)
vs
7,658 lbs

Power
PTO (claimed)
110 hp (2.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
141.3 hp (35.95 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
89.3 hp (74.65 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
135 hp (12.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Tires
Standard tires (ag) Front: 10.00x16. Rear: 18.4r42 (2wd) 
Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65

Cold-cranking amps
550  (288.52 lower than average)
vs
838.52



Scroll To Top

saved