VS

Home > Farm Tractors > AGCO RT100

AGCO RT100

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
AGCO RT100
Compare with other Farm Tractors
 Compare
AGCO RT100 VS
All other Farm Tractors
Production
Model Year 2004  
Production Manufacturer
AGCO  (equals average)
vs 5.8% Farm Tractors have AGCO
Factory Beauvais, France 
Capacity
Capacity Fuel
70 gal (0.35 gal lower than average)
vs
70.35 gal

Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs
540  (68.25 lower than average)
vs
608.25

Rear PTO Independent  vs 78.6% Farm Tractors have independent
Front PTO Optional  vs 86.9% Farm Tractors have optional
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering Hydrostatic Power  vs 81.1% Farm Tractors have hydrostatic power
Chassis 4x2 2wd  vs 12.3% Farm Tractors have 4x2 2WD
Brakes Hydraulic Wet Disc  vs 24.3% Farm Tractors have hydraulic wet disc
Cab Cab Standard With Optional Automatic Climate Control. 
Differential lock Electro-hydraulic Front And Rear 
Engine
Engine Fuel Diesel  vs 87.6% Farm Tractors have diesel
Engine Type Cummins  vs 2.2% Farm Tractors have Cummins
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged  vs 36% Farm Tractors have turbocharged
Engine Cylinders
(1.54 higher than average)
vs
4.46

Engine Bore/Stroke 4.094x5.179 Inches [104 X 132 Mm] 
Engine Displacement
408 ci (101.9 ci higher than average)
vs
306.10 ci

Engine Cooling Liquid  vs 86% Farm Tractors have Liquid
Engine Compression 17.5:1  
Engine Rated RPMs
2200  (2198 higher than average)
vs
2,340

Engine Starter volts
12  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
12.58

Engine Air cleaner Dual Paper Elements 
Engine Power
128 hp (1.14 hp lower than average)
vs
129.14 hp

Pre-heating Grid Heater 
Transmission
Transmission Type Continuously Variable Transmission  vs 3.3% Farm Tractors have continuously variable transmission
Transmission Transmission Powermaxx Cvt 
Transmission Gears Infinite (2-range) Forward And Reverse 
Dimensions
Wheelbase
109.5 inches (15.17 inches higher than average)
vs
94.33 inches

Weight (operating) 15, 055 Lbs [6828 Kg] (4wd Cvt Cab) 
Front tread 63.4 To 72.6 Inches [161 To 184 Cm] 
Rear tread 69.3 To 119.1 Inches [176 To 302 Cm] 
Clearance (drawbar)
14 inches (2.88 inches lower than average)
vs
16.88 inches

Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc) 
Hydraulics Valves
3 or (0.36 or higher than average)
vs
2.64 or

Pressure
2900 psi (2898 psi higher than average)
vs
2,737 psi

SCV flow
29 gpm (0.27 gpm lower than average)
vs
29.27 gpm

Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type Partial Power Shift 
Transmission-2 Comments Four Power Shift Gears In Four Ranges. 
Transmission-2 Transmission Quadrashift 
Transmission-2 Gears
32 forward (11.85 forward higher than average)
vs
20.15 forward

3-Point Hitch
Rear Type II/IIIN  
Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)
9000 lbs (8994 lbs higher than average)
vs
6,099 lbs

Control Electronic Lower-link 
Power
PTO (claimed)
100 hp (12.68 hp lower than average)
vs
112.68 hp

PTO (tested)
104.3 hp (72.95 hp lower than average)
vs
177.25 hp

Drawbar (tested)
89.6 hp (74.35 hp lower than average)
vs
163.95 hp

Engine
128 hp (19.82 hp lower than average)
vs
147.82 hp

Electrical
Ground Negative 
Charging system Alternator 
Charging amps
120  (8.88 higher than average)
vs
111.12

Battery
Volts
12  (equals average)
vs
12.00

Number
(0.35 higher than average)
vs
1.65



Scroll To Top

saved