VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Comparison

Compare Challenger MT675C VS Massey Ferguson 6499
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 62 differences and 24 similarities between Challenger MT675C, Massey Ferguson 6499
 
Production
Model Year   2009 vs   2008  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Production Manufacturer   Agco vs   Massey Ferguson  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Production Manufacturer”

Factory   Beauvais, France vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Factory”

Add Comment about “Production

cancel
Capacity
Capacity Fuel   155.9 Gal [590.1 L] 182.3 Gal [690.0 L] (without E3) vs   93.8 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Capacity Fuel”

Exhaust fluid (DEF)   
7.9 gal
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Exhaust fluid (DEF)”

Add Comment about “Capacity

cancel
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs   
540
vs   540
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear RPMs”

Rear PTO   Independent Electro-hydaulic vs   Independent  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear PTO”

Front PTO   Optional vs   Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front PTO”

Front RPMs   
1000
vs   1000
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front RPMs”

Add Comment about “Power Take-off (PTO)

cancel
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering   Hydrostatic Power vs   Hydrostatic Power  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mechanical Steering”

Chassis   4x4 Mfwd 4wd vs   4x4 Mfwd 4wd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Chassis”

Brakes   Hydraulic Wet Disc vs   Hydraulic Wet Disc  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brakes”

Cab   Cab Standard With Heat And Air-conditioning. Optional Heated Seat, Power Adjustable Mirrors, And Automatic Temperature Control. vs   Cab Standard.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cab”

Add Comment about “Mechanical

cancel
Engine
Engine Fuel   Diesel vs   Diesel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Fuel”

Engine Type   
Agco Sisu Power 84cta
vs   Sisudiesel 74 Cta  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Type”

Engine Aspiration   Turbocharged Intercooled vs   Turbocharged  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Aspiration”

Engine Cylinders   
6
vs   6
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cylinders”

Engine Bore/Stroke   4.37x5.71 Inches [111 X 145 Mm] vs   4.252x5.276 Inches [108 X 134 Mm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Bore/Stroke”

Engine Displacement   
512.6 ci
vs   449 ci
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Displacement”

Engine Cooling   Liquid vs   Liquid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cooling”

Engine Compression   16.7:1 vs   17.5:1  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Compression”

Engine Rated RPMs   
2,200
vs   2,200
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Rated RPMs”

Engine Torque   
1100 lb
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Torque”

Engine Torque RPMs   
1500
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Torque RPMs”

Engine Starter volts   
12
vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Starter volts”

Engine Comments   The Engine Uses Agco's E3 Selective Catalytic Reduction (scr) System To Reduce Nitrogen Oxides (nox). vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Comments”

Engine Air cleaner   Dual Paper Elements vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Air cleaner”

Engine Power   
320 hp
vs   215 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Power”

Engine Emissions   Interim Tier 4 vs   Tier Iii  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Emissions”

Engine Starter   Electric vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Starter”

Maximum Power   
350 hp
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Maximum Power”

Add Comment about “Engine

cancel
Transmission
Transmission Type   Continuously Variable Transmission vs   Partial Power Shift  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Type”

Transmission Comments    vs   Six Power Shift Gears In Four Ranges.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Comments”

Transmission Transmission   Techstar Cvt vs   Dyna-6  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Transmission”

Transmission Gears   Infinite (2-range) Forward And Reverse vs   24 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Gears”

Transmission Speeds     vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Speeds”

Add Comment about “Transmission

cancel
Dimensions
Dimensions Width    vs   98.2 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Dimensions Width”

Wheelbase   
122.2 inches
vs   118 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Wheelbase”

Weight (operating)    vs   17,460 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (operating)”

Length   
223.2 inches
vs   214 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Length”

Height (cab)   
133.1 inches
vs   120 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height (cab)”

Front tread    vs   60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front tread”

Rear tread    vs   60 To 119 Inches [152 To 302 Cm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear tread”

Weight (Shipping)   
24,250 lbs
vs   17,200 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (Shipping)”

Clearance (drawbar)    vs   17.8 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Clearance (drawbar)”

Weight (ballasted)    vs   23,920 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (ballasted)”

Weight (max capacity)   
38,890 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (max capacity)”

Add Comment about “Dimensions

cancel
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type   Closed Center Load Sensing vs   Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated (pfc)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Type”

Hydraulics Valves   
4 to
vs   3 to
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Valves”

Pressure   
2,901 psi
vs   2,900 psi
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pressure”

Valve flow   
26.4 gpm
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Valve flow”

Total flow   
46.2 gpm
vs   29
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total flow”

Add Comment about “Hydraulics

cancel
Loader
Loader Weight    vs   1670 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Weight”

Loader Loader type   Challenger Ml99b vs   Massey Ferguson 975  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Loader type”

Loader Height (to pin)   
187 inches
vs   176 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Height (to pin)”

Loader Dump clearance    vs   135 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Dump clearance”

Loader Dump reach    vs   27 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Dump reach”

Loader Dump angle   
55
vs   56
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Dump angle”

Loader Rollback angle   
41
vs   39
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Rollback angle”

Loader Breakout force (bucket)   
10,560 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (bucket)”

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)   
5,610 lbs
vs   4,920 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at pin)”

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)   
4,950 lbs
vs   4,387 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)”

Loader Breakout force (lift)   
7,700 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (lift)”

Loader Reach at ground    vs   91 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Reach at ground”

Loader Breakout force (at pin)    vs   5,952 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (at pin)”

Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)    vs   5,225 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (at 800mm)”

Loader Raise time to height    vs   7 s
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Raise time to height”

Add Comment about “Loader

cancel
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type   
Iii, Iv
vs   Iii/iiin
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Type”

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)   
21,336 lbs
vs   15,700 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)”

Front Hitch   
Iii
vs   Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front Hitch”

Front lift    vs   8,800 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front lift”

Rear lift (at ends)   
26,460 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at ends)”

Front lift (at ends)   
11,020 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front lift (at ends)”

Add Comment about “3-Point Hitch

cancel
Power
PTO (claimed)   
275 hp
vs   180 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (claimed)”

PTO (tested)   
316.6 hp
vs   216.2 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (tested)”

Drawbar (tested)   
240.7 hp
vs   167 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Drawbar (tested)”

Engine   
320 hp
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine”

Engine (gross)    vs   215 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine (gross)”

Add Comment about “Power

cancel
Electrical
Charging system   Alternator vs   Alternator  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging system”

Charging amps   
240
vs   150
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging amps”

Add Comment about “Electrical

cancel
Tires
Ag front   
480/70r34
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ag front”

Ag rear   
520/85r46
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ag rear”

Standard tires (ag)    vs   Front: 14.9r30. Rear: 18.4r42  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Standard tires (ag)”

Add Comment about “Tires

cancel
Battery
Volts   
12
vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Volts”

Number    vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number”

Cold-cranking amps    vs   600
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cold-cranking amps”

Add Comment about “Battery

cancel

Compare Challenger MT675C vs Massey Ferguson 6499 Farm Tractors


Scroll To Top

saved