VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Comparison

Compare Challenger MT645C VS New Holland T8.360
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 59 differences and 20 similarities between Challenger MT645C, New Holland T8.360
 
Production
Model Year   2009 vs   2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Production Manufacturer   Agco vs   New Holland  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Production Manufacturer”

Factory   Beauvais, France vs   Racine, Wisconsin, Usa  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Factory”

Add Comment about “Production

cancel
Capacity
Capacity Fuel   155.9 Gal [590.1 L] 182.3 Gal [690.0 L] (without E3) vs   168 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Capacity Fuel”

Exhaust fluid (DEF)   
7.9 gal
vs   24 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Exhaust fluid (DEF)”

Add Comment about “Capacity

cancel
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs   
540
vs   1000
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear RPMs”

Rear PTO   Independent Electro-hydaulic vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear PTO”

Front PTO   Optional vs   Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front PTO”

Front RPMs   
1000
vs   1000 (1-3/4)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front RPMs”

Add Comment about “Power Take-off (PTO)

cancel
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering   Hydrostatic Power vs   Hydrostatic Power  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mechanical Steering”

Chassis   4x4 Mfwd 4wd vs   4x4 Mfwd 4wd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Chassis”

Brakes   Hydraulic Wet Disc vs   Hydraulic Wet Disc  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brakes”

Cab   Cab Standard With Heat And Air-conditioning. Optional Heated Seat, Power Adjustable Mirrors, And Automatic Temperature Control. vs   Cab Standard.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cab”

Add Comment about “Mechanical

cancel
Engine
Engine Fuel   Diesel vs   Diesel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Fuel”

Engine Type   
Agco Sisu Power 84cta
vs   Fpt
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Type”

Engine Aspiration   Turbocharged Intercooled vs   Turbocharged Aftercooled  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Aspiration”

Engine Cylinders   
6
vs   6
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cylinders”

Engine Bore/Stroke   4.37x5.71 Inches [111 X 145 Mm] vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Bore/Stroke”

Engine Displacement   
512.6 ci
vs   531 ci
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Displacement”

Engine Cooling   Liquid vs   Liquid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cooling”

Engine Compression   16.7:1 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Compression”

Engine Rated RPMs   
2,200
vs   2000
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Rated RPMs”

Engine Torque   
874 lb
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Torque”

Engine Torque RPMs   
1500
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Torque RPMs”

Engine Starter volts   
12
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Starter volts”

Engine Comments   The Engine Uses Agco's E3 Selective Catalytic Reduction (scr) System To Reduce Nitrogen Oxides (nox). vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Comments”

Engine Valves    vs   24
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Valves”

Engine Power   
240 hp
vs   307 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Power”

Engine Starter type    vs   Electric  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Starter type”

Engine Emissions   Interim Tier 4 vs   Interim Tier 4  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Emissions”

Engine Starter   Electric vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Starter”

Maximum Power   
270 hp
vs   358 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Maximum Power”

Add Comment about “Engine

cancel
Transmission
Transmission Type   Continuously Variable Transmission vs   Full Power Shift  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Type”

Transmission Transmission   Techstar Cvt vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Transmission”

Transmission Gears   Infinite Forward And Reverse vs   19 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Gears”

Transmission Speeds     vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Speeds”

Add Comment about “Transmission

cancel
Dimensions
Wheelbase   
122.2 inches
vs   135.8 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Wheelbase”

Weight (operating)   
25,795 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (operating)”

Length   
223.2 inches
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Length”

Height (cab)   
133.1 inches
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height (cab)”

Rear tread    vs   60 To 88 Inches [152 To 223 Cm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear tread”

Weight (Shipping)   
24,250 lbs
vs   24,480 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (Shipping)”

Rear Axle    vs   4.5 By 120 Inches [114x3048 Mm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Axle”

Weight (max capacity)   
38,890 lbs
vs   34,425 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (max capacity)”

Add Comment about “Dimensions

cancel
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type   Closed Center Load Sensing vs   Closed Center Load Sensing  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Type”

Hydraulics Valves   
4 to
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Valves”

Pressure   
2,901 psi
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pressure”

Pump flow    vs   35 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pump flow”

Valve flow   
26.4 gpm
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Valve flow”

Total flow   
46.2 gpm
vs   42.5 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total flow”

Rear valves    vs   4 to
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear valves”

Add Comment about “Hydraulics

cancel
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type    vs   Full Power Shift  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Type”

Transmission-2 Gears    vs   18 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Gears”

Add Comment about “Transmission-2

cancel
Loader
Loader Loader type   Challenger Ml99b vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Loader type”

Loader Height (to pin)   
187 inches
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Height (to pin)”

Loader Dump angle   
55
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Dump angle”

Loader Rollback angle   
41
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Rollback angle”

Loader Breakout force (bucket)   
10,560 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (bucket)”

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)   
5,610 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at pin)”

Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)   
4,950 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at 800mm)”

Loader Breakout force (lift)   
7,700 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (lift)”

Add Comment about “Loader

cancel
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type   
Iii, Iv
vs   3/3n
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Type”

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)   
21,336 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)”

Rear lift    vs   16,375 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift”

Front Hitch   
Iii
vs   Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front Hitch”

Rear lift (at ends)   
26,460 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at ends)”

Front lift (at ends)   
11,020 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front lift (at ends)”

Add Comment about “3-Point Hitch

cancel
Power
PTO (claimed)   
205 hp
vs   233 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (claimed)”

PTO (tested)   
242.3 hp
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (tested)”

Drawbar (tested)   
180.1 hp
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Drawbar (tested)”

Engine   
240 hp
vs   307 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine”

Add Comment about “Power

cancel
Electrical
Ground    vs   Negative  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ground”

Charging system   Alternator vs   Alternator  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging system”

Charging amps   
240
vs   200
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging amps”

Charging volts    vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging volts”

Add Comment about “Electrical

cancel
Tires
Ag front   
480/70r34
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ag front”

Ag rear   
520/85r46
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ag rear”

Add Comment about “Tires

cancel
Battery
Volts   
12
vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Volts”

Number    vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number”

Add Comment about “Battery

cancel

Compare Challenger MT645C vs New Holland T8.360 Farm Tractors


Scroll To Top

saved