VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Comparison

Compare Challenger MT265 VS CaseIH Farmall DX18E
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 34 differences and 7 similarities between Challenger MT265, CaseIH Farmall DX18E
 
Production
Model Year   2003 vs   2004  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Production Manufacturer   Iseki vs   Caseih  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Production Manufacturer”

Factory   Matsuyama, Japan vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Factory”

Distributor   Agco vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Distributor”

Add Comment about “Production

cancel
Capacity
Capacity Fuel    vs   7.9 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Capacity Fuel”

Add Comment about “Capacity

cancel
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs    vs   540
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear RPMs”

Rear PTO   Independent vs   Independent  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear PTO”

Mid PTO   Optional vs   Standard  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mid PTO”

Mid RPMs    vs   2,200
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mid RPMs”

Add Comment about “Power Take-off (PTO)

cancel
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering   Hydrostatic Power vs   Power  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mechanical Steering”

Chassis   4x4 Mfwd 4wd vs   4x4 Mfwd 4wd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Chassis”

Cab   Two-post Rops vs   Two-post Rops. Canopy And Soft Cab Optional.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cab”

Add Comment about “Mechanical

cancel
Engine
Engine Fuel   Diesel vs   Diesel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Fuel”

Engine Type    vs   Shibaura  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Type”

Engine Aspiration   Natural vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Aspiration”

Engine Cylinders   
3
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cylinders”

Engine Displacement    vs   58.2 ci
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Displacement”

Engine Cooling   Liquid vs   Liquid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cooling”

Engine Rated RPMs    vs   3,000
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Rated RPMs”

Engine Power   
33 hp
vs   18 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Power”

Add Comment about “Engine

cancel
Transmission
Transmission Type    vs   Hydrostatic  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Type”

Transmission Transmission   Powershuttle vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Transmission”

Transmission Gears   
16 forward
vs   Infinite (2-range) Forward And Reverse  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Gears”

Add Comment about “Transmission

cancel
Dimensions
Dimensions / Weight   
3,041 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Dimensions / Weight”

Wheelbase    vs   55 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Wheelbase”

Weight (Shipping)    vs   1314 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (Shipping)”

Add Comment about “Dimensions

cancel
Hydraulics
Total flow   
12.2
vs   5.5 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total flow”

Add Comment about “Hydraulics

cancel
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Type   Hydrostatic vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Type”

Transmission-2 Gears   Infinite (3-range) Forward And Reverse vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Gears”

Add Comment about “Transmission-2

cancel
Loader
Loader Loader type    vs   Caseih Lx110  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Loader type”

Loader Height (to pin)    vs   69 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Height (to pin)”

Loader Lift to full height (at pin)    vs   662 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at pin)”

Loader Lift to full height (at 500mm)    vs   454 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Lift to full height (at 500mm)”

Loader Breakout force (at pin)    vs   1361 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (at pin)”

Loader Breakout force (at 500mm)    vs   953 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Loader Breakout force (at 500mm)”

Add Comment about “Loader

cancel
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type   
I
vs   I
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Type”

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)   2, 100 Lbs [952 Kg] (gear)1, 940 Lbs [879 Kg] (hydro) vs   700 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)”

Rear lift (at ends)   2, 755 Lbs [1249 Kg] (gear)2, 866 Lbs [1300 Kg] (hydro) vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at ends)”

Add Comment about “3-Point Hitch

cancel
Power
PTO (claimed)   27 Hp [20.1 Kw] (gear)25 Hp [18.6 Kw] (hydro) vs   13.7 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (claimed)”

Engine    vs   18 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine”

Engine (gross)   
33 hp
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine (gross)”

Add Comment about “Power

cancel

Compare Challenger MT265 vs CaseIH Farmall DX18E Farm Tractors


Scroll To Top

saved