VS

Home > Farm Tractors > Comparison

Compare AGCO RT145 VS CaseIH Puma 165
 
 
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 55 differences and 21 similarities between AGCO RT145, CaseIH Puma 165
 
Production
Model Year   2002 vs   2007  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Model Year”

Production Manufacturer   Agco vs   Caseih  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Production Manufacturer”

Factory   Beauvais, France vs   Basildon, England  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Factory”

Original price (USD)    vs   $123, 515 (2010)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Original price (USD)”

Add Comment about “Production

cancel
Capacity
Capacity Fuel   
108 gal
vs   116 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Capacity Fuel”

Hydraulic system    vs   26.5 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulic system”

Add Comment about “Capacity

cancel
Power Take-off (PTO)
Rear RPMs   
540
vs   540
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear RPMs”

Rear PTO   Independent vs   Independent  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear PTO”

Front PTO    vs   Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front PTO”

Front RPMs    vs   1000
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front RPMs”

Add Comment about “Power Take-off (PTO)

cancel
Mechanical
Mechanical Steering   Hydrostatic Power vs   Hydrostatic Power  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Mechanical Steering”

Chassis   4x2 2wd vs   4x2 2wd  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Chassis”

Brakes   Hydraulic Wet Disc vs   Differential Hydraulic Wet Disc  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Brakes”

Cab   Cab Standard. vs   Cab Standard.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cab”

Trailer brakes    vs   Hydraulic Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Trailer brakes”

Add Comment about “Mechanical

cancel
Engine
Engine Fuel   Diesel vs   Diesel  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Fuel”

Engine Type   Cummins B5.9t vs   Cnh
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Type”

Engine Aspiration   Turbocharged vs   Turbocharged Intercooled  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Aspiration”

Engine Cylinders   
6
vs   6
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cylinders”

Engine Bore/Stroke   4.016x4.724 Inches [102 X 120 Mm] vs   4.094x5.197 Inches [104 X 132 Mm]  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Bore/Stroke”

Engine Displacement   
359 ci
vs   411 ci
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Displacement”

Engine Cooling   Liquid vs   Liquid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Cooling”

Engine Compression   17.4:1 vs   16.5:1  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Compression”

Engine Rated RPMs   
2,200
vs   2,200
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Rated RPMs”

Engine Torque   
486 lb
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Torque”

Engine Torque RPMs   
1549
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Torque RPMs”

Engine Starter volts   
12
vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Starter volts”

Engine Air cleaner    vs   Dual Paper Elements With Aspirator  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Air cleaner”

Engine Valves    vs   24
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Valves”

Engine Power    vs   165 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Power”

Engine Oil capacity    vs   16 qts
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Oil capacity”

Engine Emissions    vs   Tier 3  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine Emissions”

Add Comment about “Engine

cancel
Transmission
Transmission Clutch   Wet Disc vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Clutch”

Transmission Type   Full Power Shift vs   Full Power Shift  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Type”

Transmission Comments    vs   The 17-speed Powershift Transmission Was Standard On 2wd Models.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Comments”

Transmission Gears   
18 forward
vs   17 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Gears”

Transmission Speeds     vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission Speeds”

Add Comment about “Transmission

cancel
Dimensions
Dimensions Width   
117.7 inches
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Dimensions Width”

Wheelbase   
111.2 inches
vs   113.6 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Wheelbase”

Weight (operating)    vs   17,725 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (operating)”

Length   
198 inches
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Length”

Height (cab)   
120 inches
vs   119.7 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height (cab)”

2WD Weight (shipping)   
14,880 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “2WD Weight (shipping)”

4WD Weight (shipping)   
16,894 lbs
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “4WD Weight (shipping)”

Weight (Shipping)    vs   15,708 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Weight (Shipping)”

Rear Axle    vs   4.125 By 112 Inches [104x2844 Mm] 4.125 By 98 Inches [104x2489 Mm] (optional)4.125 By 119 Inches [104x3022 Mm] (optional)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Axle”

Height (exhaust)    vs   122.6 inches
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Height (exhaust)”

Add Comment about “Dimensions

cancel
Hydraulics
Hydraulics Type   Closed Center vs   Pressure Flow Compensating (pfc)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Type”

Hydraulics Valves    vs   3 to
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Hydraulics Valves”

Pressure   
2,900 psi
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pressure”

Pump flow   
29 gpm
vs   31.7 Gpm [120.0 Lpm] (powershift Std.)  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Pump flow”

SCV flow   
27.7 gpm
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “SCV flow”

Capacity (cu. ft.)    vs   26.5 gal
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Capacity (cu. ft.)”

Total flow    vs   48.7
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total flow”

Steering flow    vs   17 gpm
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Steering flow”

Add Comment about “Hydraulics

cancel
Transmission-2
Transmission-2 Clutch   Wet Disc vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Clutch”

Transmission-2 Type   Partial Power Shift vs   Full Power Shift  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Type”

Transmission-2 Comments   Four Power Shift Gears In Eight Synchronized Ranges. vs   On 4wd Models The 18-speed Transmission Was Standard Equipment.  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Comments”

Transmission-2 Transmission   Quadrashift vs   Econogear  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Transmission”

Transmission-2 Gears   
32 forward
vs   18 forward
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Gears”

Transmission-2 Speeds    vs      
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Transmission-2 Speeds”

Add Comment about “Transmission-2

cancel
3-Point Hitch
Rear Type   
3/3n
vs   Ii/iiin
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear Type”

Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)   
14,500 lbs
vs   10,900 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at 24"/610mm)”

Front Hitch    vs   Optional  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Front Hitch”

Rear lift (at ends)    vs   12,787 lbs
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Rear lift (at ends)”

Add Comment about “3-Point Hitch

cancel
Power
PTO (claimed)   
145 hp
vs   135 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (claimed)”

PTO (tested)   
155.91 hp
vs   163.2 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “PTO (tested)”

Drawbar (tested)   
127.52 hp
vs   107 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Drawbar (tested)”

Engine    vs   165 hp
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Engine”

Add Comment about “Power

cancel
Electrical
Ground   Negative vs   Negative  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Ground”

Charging system    vs   Alternator  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging system”

Charging amps    vs   150
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Charging amps”

Add Comment about “Electrical

cancel
Tires
Standard tires (ag)    vs   Front: 16.9r30. Rear: 20.8r42  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Standard tires (ag)”

Add Comment about “Tires

cancel
Battery
Volts   
12
vs   12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Volts”

Number    vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number”

Cold-cranking amps    vs   1300
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Cold-cranking amps”

Add Comment about “Battery

cancel

Compare AGCO RT145 vs CaseIH Puma 165 Farm Tractors


Scroll To Top

saved